Harbourline Wealth, an AFS licensee, builds its approved product list from a research house's 'recommended' ratings. The research house is paid by the fund managers whose products it rates, and Harbourline has never reviewed its methods. Before relying on the ratings, Harbourline should MOST consider…
ASIC expects advice providers to do due diligence on any research report provider they use, considering its business model, conflicts of interest, product selection process, methodology and ratings spread (RG 175.250–175.251). Research can be relied on to some extent, but the adviser remains responsible for the advice (RG 175.248), and a reasonable investigation under s961B(2)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (compilation 19 Sep 2026) needs more than a label. Issuer-paid ratings are a conflict signal that calls for scrutiny. A licence does not answer the conflict question. A second rating and an up-to-date rating are sensible extra checks, but neither tells Harbourline whether the research house's methods and conflicts make its ratings reliable.
A rating paid for by the product issuer needs scrutiny before reliance.
Practise more Professional commitment, ethical frameworks and referral questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original practice material mapped to the learning outcomes in ASIC's exam guidance. Independent, not affiliated with or endorsed by ASIC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.