Esther, a licensee's remediation lead, finds that 600 clients were charged an advice fee in error, some by less than A$5. Although those clients would never notice, she insists that every one is refunded, saying each person should receive what they are due. Esther's reasoning reflects the…
The Markkula Center's Framework for Ethical Decision Making (revised Nov 2021) summarises the justice lens as the idea that each person should be given their due, often read as fair or equal treatment. Refunding every affected client, however small the amount, applies that idea. The utilitarian lens would weigh the total cost of refunds against the total benefit, which could favour skipping the small amounts. The common good lens looks at the welfare of the community as a whole rather than what each person is owed. Care ethics focuses on relationships and individual circumstances, which Esther does not mention.
'What they are due' is the signature phrase of the justice lens.
Practise more Professional commitment, ethical frameworks and referral questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original practice material mapped to the learning outcomes in ASIC's exam guidance. Independent, not affiliated with or endorsed by ASIC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.