Rosa, an authorised representative of Tidewell Advisory, tells Mr Kaur, 66, a retail client, that a listed hybrid security is 'capital guaranteed'. It is not. He invests A$40,000; the hybrid's price has not moved, so he has lost nothing. For breach reporting, Rosa's breach is BEST described as…
Under s912D(4)(c) of the Corporations Act 2001 (compilation 19 Sep 2026), a breach of a core obligation constituted by a contravention of s1041H(1) (misleading or deceptive conduct about a financial product or service) is taken to be significant. Calling an unguaranteed hybrid 'capital guaranteed' is that conduct, so Tidewell has a reportable situation to report within 30 days (s912DAA(3)). Material loss is a separate deeming ground (s912D(4)(d)); it is not needed when another ground applies. The number of similar breaches is a factor under s912D(5), which matters only for breaches that are not deemed significant. Correcting the statement is good practice, but it does not undo the breach, and 30 days is the reporting deadline, not a cure period.
Loss is only one route to significance; misleading conduct is deemed significant even when nobody has lost money.
Practise more Conduct rules, breach reporting, DDO and AFCA questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original practice material mapped to the learning outcomes in ASIC's exam guidance. Independent, not affiliated with or endorsed by ASIC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.