Nikolai Petrov, an adviser at Saltbush Financial, recommends that Mr Reyes, 52, keep his retail super fund, whose issuer is Saltbush's parent company. Saltbush's lawyers say nothing in the arrangement breaches Chapter 7. The fund suits Mr Reyes, but a cheaper fund with the same features is available. The Code says it 'imposes ethical duties that go above the requirements in the law'. Nikolai's recommendation is BEST described as one that…
The Code of Ethics 2019 imposes duties above the law (cl 5). Standard 2 requires Nikolai to act in Mr Reyes's best interests, which a dearer fund with the same features may not serve, and Standard 3 prohibits acting under a conflict, here a product issued by his licensee's parent. Chapter 7 compliance settles the legal question only. Disclosure in the SOA is required, but it does not cure a Standard 3 conflict. The Code binds Nikolai personally (Corporations Act 2001 s921E, compilation 19 Sep 2026), whatever Saltbush's own exposure. A compliance policy can add to the Code but cannot replace it.
Lawful under Chapter 7 does not mean compliant with the Code.
Practise more Code of Ethics: values and ethical behaviour (Standards 1–3) questions
Exam-style questions with worked answers, then full timed mocks. Free to start.
Build a daily practice habit — a few exam-style questions a day, with worked answers. Free to start.
Start practising →Original practice material mapped to the learning outcomes in ASIC's exam guidance. Independent, not affiliated with or endorsed by ASIC. Verify figures and rules against current guidance before relying on them.